Article
What You Need to Know About New Accounting Standards – 2023 Accounting Update
May 18, 2023
Accounting standards year end

After a busy 2022 implementing the new lease standard, many accountants now need to shift focus to the next potentially significant new accounting standard, the current expected credit loss model (CECL).

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments or CECL several years ago, but the standard became widely applicable for private businesses and not-for-profit entities in 2023.

CECL

CECL is expected to have the greatest impact on the financial statements of financial institutions. Still, other entities will need to consider the impact of CECL on any financial instruments they hold.

Financial instruments include things like trade receivables, debt securities, loans, net investments in leases, off-balance-sheet credit exposures, and reinsurance receivables. Most entities have some of these instruments and will have to assess the impact of CECL on their accounting for the instruments. In addition to the accounting for CECL, the new standard also expands the disclosure requirements in several areas.

Leases: Common Control Arrangements

Another ASU expected to have wide applicability is ASU 2023-01, Leases (Topic 842): Common Control Arrangements. This standard provides relief in lease accounting to private businesses and not-for-profit entities with common control lease arrangements.

FASB issued the ASU due to feedback it received on the challenges that were being faced by stakeholders in applying the new lease standard to common control lease arrangements. The ASU addresses the two largest stakeholder concerns. First are the terms and conditions to be considered in evaluating common control leases. Second is the accounting for leasehold improvements in common control leases.

New Accounting Standards Issued in 2023

The new credit loss standard and updates to the lease standard aren’t the only changes organizations should be aware of. FASB issued an ASU in 2023 that addresses the accounting for investments in certain tax credit structures. Additionally, there are several ASUs issued in prior years that will be effective for December 31, 2023* financial statements.

* Generally, FASB sets effective dates by segregating public business entities (PBE) from all other entities. Occasionally, FASB will additionally segregate smaller reporting companies (SRCs), not-for-profit entities (NFPs) that have issued or are conduit bond obligors for securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on an exchange or an over-the-counter market, or employee benefit plans that file or furnish financial statements with or to the SEC. The effective dates included below are the dates applicable to both PBE and non-PBE entities. However, the non-PBE effective dates are used in determining if they are applicable for 2023.

2023-02—Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)
Summary: FASB issued this ASU with the intent of improving the accounting and disclosures for investments in tax credit structures. The ASU allows reporting entities to elect to account for qualifying tax equity investments using the proportional amortization method, regardless of the program giving rise to the related income tax credits. Reporting entities were previously permitted to apply the proportional amortization method only to qualifying tax equity investments in low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) structures. In addition, LIHTC investments not accounted for using the proportional amortization method will no longer be permitted to use the delayed equity contribution guidance.

The amendments in this ASU must be applied on either a modified retrospective or a retrospective basis, except for LIHTC investments not accounted for using the proportional amortization method which have modified transition methods.
Effective date for PBEs Fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023 (interim periods within those fiscal years)
Effective date for non-PBEs Fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 (interim periods within those fiscal years)
Early adoption Permitted
2023-01—Leases (Topic 842): Common Control Arrangements
Summary: FASB issued this ASU to provide relief to related party lease arrangements between entities under common control.

Issue #1: The ASU provides private companies and not-for-profit organizations that are not conduit bond obligors with a practical expedient to use the written terms and conditions of a common control arrangement to determine whether a lease exists and, if so, the classification of and accounting for that lease, allowing for broad flexibility in the formality of what constitutes written terms and conditions.

Issue #2: The ASU requires all entities, including public companies, to amortize leasehold improvements associated with common control leases over the useful life to the common control group.
Effective date for all entities Fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023 (interim periods within those fiscal years)
Early adoption Permitted

Do you know which accounting standards apply to your entity? Figuring out what affects your organization can be complicated.

What's Effective for Non-Public December 31, 2023 Financial Statements?

Do you know which standards updates you need to consider as you are preparing 2023 interim and year-end financial statements? The following ASUs are effective for December 31, 2023 financial statements (applicable to all entities, unless otherwise noted).

2022-04—Liabilities—Supplier Finance Programs (Subtopic 405-50): Disclosure of Supplier Finance Program Obligations
Summary: This ASU enhances the transparency of supplier finance programs by requiring disclosures related to the programs. A supplier finance program is an arrangement that allows a buyer to offer its suppliers access to payment in advance of the invoice due date. This access to early payment is generally provided by a third-party based on the invoices that the buy confirms are valid. These programs are becoming increasingly popular as they provide suppliers with cash flows more quickly than waiting for the invoice due date.

Disclosure requirements under the ASU include:
  1. Key terms of the program, assets pledged as security, and other forms of guarantees.
  2. For obligations that the buyer has confirmed as valid, each of the following items should be disclosed:
    1. The outstanding confirmed amount as of the end of the annual period,
    2. A description of where the obligations are presented in the balance sheet, and
    3. A rollforward of the obligations during the annual period.

The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively, except for the amendment on rollforward information, which should be applied prospectively.
Effective date for all entities Fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022 (interim periods within those fiscal years, except the amendment on rollforward information, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023)
Early adoption Permitted
2022-02—Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures
Summary: Since FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments) it has been conducting post-implementation review activities to gain insights from stakeholders and, when necessary, consider if further updates are needed. As part of its post-implementation review of credit losses, FASB has issued this ASU. The ASU addresses troubled debt restructurings by creditors (TDRs) and vintage disclosures of gross writeoffs.

TDRs – Stakeholders questioned the relevancy of the TDR designation and the usefulness of the related disclosures. This ASU eliminates the accounting guidance for TDRs for creditors who have adopted CECL and requires that those entities evaluate whether the modification represents a new loan or a continuation of an existing loan. Additionally, the ASU enhances certain disclosure requirements.

Vintage Disclosures – Investors noted the amount of gross writeoff information by year of origination was an essential input to their analysis. This ASU adds a requirement that public business entities disclosure current-period gross writeoffs by year of origination for financing receivables and net investments in leases.

The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively. For the recognition and measurement of TDRs, entities have the option to apply a modified retrospective application.
Effective date for entities that previously adopted ASU 2016-13 (generally PBEs) Fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022 (including interim periods within those fiscal years)
Effective date for entities that have not yet adopted ASU 2016-13 (generally non-PBEs) Follows the effective date for ASU 2016-13
Early adoption Permitted for entities that had adopted ASU 2016-13
2022-01—Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Fair Value Hedging—Portfolio Layer Method
Summary: FASB issued this ASU in response to questions and input from stakeholders when they implemented ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The ASU is intended to better align hedge accounting with an organization’s risk management strategies. To address the stakeholder questions and input, this ASU:
  1. expands the current last-of-layer method which only permits one hedged layer to allow multiple hedged layers of a single closed portfolio and renames the last-of-layer method to the portfolio layer method;
  2. expands the scope of the portfolio layer method to include nonprepayable financial assets;
  3. specifies that eligible hedging instruments in a single-layer hedge may include spot-starting or forward-starting constant-notional swaps, or spot or forward-starting amortizing-notional swaps and that the number of hedged layers (that is, single or multiple) corresponds with the number of hedges designated;
  4. provides guidance on accounting and disclosures related to hedge basis adjustments that are applicable to the portfolio layer method whether a single hedged layer or multiple hedged layers are designated; and
  5. specifies how hedge basis adjustments should be considered when determining credit losses for the assets included in the closed portfolio.

The amendments in this ASU should be applied on a modified retrospective basis for hedge basis adjustments under the portfolio layer method. Entities have the option to apply the disclosure changes prospectively or retrospectively. Additionally, entities may designate multiple hedged layers of a single close portfolio solely on a prospective basis.
Effective date for PBEs Fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022 (interim periods within those fiscal years)
Effective date for non-PBEs Fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023 (interim periods within those fiscal years)
Early adoption Permitted
2020-04—Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (the following updates are related to Reference Rate Reform)
2022-06—Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848; 2021-01—Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope
Summary: The LIBOR reference rate is being phased out which will require entities to update their contracts to a new reference rate. FASB issued this ASU to ease the transition to new reference rates by allowing several optional expedients which will reduce the cost and complexity of accounting for the change. The ASU affects all entities that have contracts, hedging relationships, or other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate that is expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform.
Effective date for all entities From March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2024
2020-03—Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments
Summary: FASB issued this ASU to make targeted improvements to the accounting standards for various financial instrument topics. The targeted improvements (1) clarify that all entities are required to provide certain fair value option disclosures, (2) clarify that certain nonfinancial items can apply the portfolio exception under Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, (3) clarify that certain disclosures in Topic 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities, also apply to Topic 942, Financial Services – Depository and Lending, (4) improve the understandability of the guidance by cross-referencing paragraphs within Topic 470, Debt, (5) improve the understandability of the guidance by cross-referencing paragraphs within Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, (6) clarify that the contractual terms of net investment in a lease under Topic 842, Leases, should be the same as the term used to measure expected credit losses under Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, and (7) clarify that an allowance for credit losses should be recorded when an entity regains control of a financial asset sold.
Effective date Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 – Fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019
Item 3 – Fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019
Items 6 and 7 – Adopt along with ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326). If ASU 2016-13 has already been adopted, fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019.
Early adoption Permitted for items 1, 2, 4, and 5
2017-04—Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment; 2019-10—Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates
Summary: This ASU simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairments by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment testing. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with its carrying amount. Under the new guidance, entities will perform their annual, or interim, impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. The ASU also aligns the impairment assessment for reporting units with a zero or negative carrying amount with the impairment assessment for all other reporting units.
Effective date Fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022
Early adoption Permitted
2016-13—Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (the following updates are related to Credit Losses)
2019-11—Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses; 2019-10—Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates; 2019-05—Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Targeted Transition Relief; 2019-04—Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments; 2018-19—Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses
Summary: This ASU is a comprehensive change to the accounting for credit losses. The ASU requires entities to measure all expected credits losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Additionally, the ASU updates the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration.
Effective date Fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022
Early adoption Permitted
Expand Full Article

We're Here to Help

We are here to help
From business growth to compliance and digital optimization, Eide Bailly is here to help you thrive and embrace opportunity.
Speak to our specialists

About the Author